Understanding Japan’s Nuclear Crisis

Understanding Japan’s Nuclear Crisis
Q&A
Summary
In the aftermath of a devastating earthquake and tsunami, Japan is scrambling to avert further problems at damaged nuclear plants.
Related Media and Tools
 

In the aftermath of last week’s devastating earthquake and tsunami, Japan is trying to prevent a nuclear crisis from escalating. James Acton, who visited a Japanese nuclear plant after a 2007 earthquake, details what happened and what needs to be done as Japan scrambles to avert further problems at damaged nuclear plants.

Why did the earthquake lead to a nuclear crisis in Japan?

The reactors at Japan’s seaside Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power station are “boiling water reactors.” The idea behind them is simple. Energy produced via nuclear reactions in the fuel is used to turn water into steam. The steam then drives generators to produce electricity. When a reactor is turned “off” nuclear reactions essentially stop immediately, but the radioactivity in the reactor’s core still produces heat. This means that the reactor needs to be cooled even after it is shut down.

When the earthquake hit last Friday, the reactors automatically turned themselves off—as they were supposed to—by inserting the control rods into the reactors. The problem was that the reactors still needed to be cooled even after shutdown. The water pumps that keep the core cool rely on electricity. There were two external power lines running to the nuclear complex, but both of them were disrupted by the earthquake. As a backup, there were also diesel generators on site. The diesel generators then started as they were supposed to, but the tsunami flooded the generators and prevented them from producing electricity.

This was essentially the start of the crisis. From then on, the plant operators and Japanese safety authorities have been struggling to cool reactors with, it seems, limited electricity and water supplies. It appears as though there were some backup batteries onsite and the operators may have brought more in, but exactly how effective they were and how long they provided electricity is unclear.
 

What happens when the reactors can’t be cooled down?

If there is too much heating and no way to cool the reactor, then the core can start to melt. The word “meltdown” is frequently used, but in many ways this is an unhelpful word—there’s actually a spectrum of possible outcomes. Japanese authorities already suspect that there has been some melting of some of the fuel in the core of some of the reactors units, but there is a wide range of possibilities with the absolute worst-case scenario being that there is a massive meltdown of the entire core.

 

How did Japanese authorities respond to the crisis?

There was a very complicated chain of events leading to where we are now, but this is only partially understood at the moment. We do know, however, that the cooling of the reactor cores was inadequate and unit 1 was the first reactor to show serious signs of problems.

In the end, the operators decided to pump seawater directly into the core of the first reactor in order to try and keep it cool. As pumping water into the core will effectively destroy the reactor, this would only have been done if the reactor is expected to be lost anyway.

As this was happening, the cooling system seemed to be working for unit 3. But for unexplained reasons the cooling was cut off and ultimately the operators also decided to pump seawater into the third reactor. Unit 2 also was being pumped with sea water. The process—for reasons that are unclear—hit problems and fuel reactors became fully exposed on Monday. Water levels have now recovered slightly but not to where they should be.
 

Does the venting of steam from the reactors in the atmosphere pose a danger to the environment and surrounding population?

As the reactors overheat a great deal of water is being quickly turned into steam and if the pressure becomes too high the steam needs to be let out or there is a risk of an explosion. The steam was first vented from the reactor vessel into the containment building that surrounds the reactor and, for reasons safety, the steam eventually needed to be vented into the environment.

Based on the information currently at hand, the amount of radioactivity in the steam is low. And if the situation doesn’t get worse, the venting of steam is unlikely to cause significant damage to people or the environment.
 

Why have there been two explosions?

In the extreme conditions inside a malfunctioning reactor, steam can react with the metal that surrounds the fuel and produce hydrogen. Hydrogen is explosive. The good news, in one way, is that the safety systems worked, because the hydrogen was vented away from the containment building and surrounding structure. One safety system, however, did not get rid of the hydrogen as they were designed to do, possibly because they lacked power.

Eventually the hydrogen built up and there was an explosion at the first reactor on Saturday. Japanese authorities have said that the containment building itself was not damaged during the explosion. There was a second explosion on Monday when the containment building’s roof blew off at unit 3, reportedly from the same cause.
 

What happens if the situation gets worse?

The reason that we don’t want the core of a nuclear reactor to start melting is the risk of highly radioactive products can then be transferred into the environment much more easily. A core melt, however, does not necessarily lead to large quantities of radiation reaching the environment. At the Three Mile Island accident in 1979 there was significant core melting, but a very small release of radiation. However, Japan is now in an unknown situation once the core starts to melt significantly and there is a high risk of large amounts of radioactivity leaking into the environment.

Although the Chernobyl accident in 1986 is often mentioned, a similar explosion of the reactor vessel in this case is very unlikely. So, the Chernobyl disaster is probably unhelpful for understanding Japan’s current crisis.  

 

What happens next? How long does Japan have to contain the crisis?

The situation at the moment is unclear with Japanese authorities doing everything they can to cool the reactor cores. There is a range of possible outcomes and it’s impossible to know exactly how long the authorities have to cool the reactors. The speed at which the core is melting—if indeed it is melting at the moment—depends on a number of factors from its temperature to how well the cooling systems are working. And it’s impossible to put numbers on this, but Japan could have anywhere from hours to days to bring the damaged reactors under control.

There is also another nearby nuclear complex, Fukushima Daini, where a state of emergency has been declared for three reactors. There is almost no information about what is going on there, but the hope is that this is just a precautionary state of emergency.
 

End of document

Comments

 
Source http://carnegieendowment.org/2011/03/14/understanding-japan-s-nuclear-crisis/152c

More from The Global Think Tank

In Fact

 

45%

of the Chinese general public

believe their country should share a global leadership role.

30%

of Indian parliamentarians

have criminal cases pending against them.

140

charter schools in the United States

are linked to Turkey’s Gülen movement.

2.5–5

thousand tons of chemical weapons

are in North Korea’s possession.

92%

of import tariffs

among Chile, Colombia, Mexico, and Peru have been eliminated.

$2.34

trillion a year

is unaccounted for in official Chinese income statistics.

37%

of GDP in oil-exporting Arab countries

comes from the mining sector.

72%

of Europeans and Turks

are opposed to intervention in Syria.

90%

of Russian exports to China

are hydrocarbons; machinery accounts for less than 1%.

13%

of undiscovered oil

is in the Arctic.

17

U.S. government shutdowns

occurred between 1976 and 1996.

40%

of Ukrainians

want an “international economic union” with the EU.

120

million electric bicycles

are used in Chinese cities.

60–70%

of the world’s energy supply

is consumed by cities.

58%

of today’s oils

require unconventional extraction techniques.

67%

of the world's population

will reside in cities by 2050.

50%

of Syria’s population

is expected to be displaced by the end of 2013.

18%

of the U.S. economy

is consumed by healthcare.

81%

of Brazilian protesters

learned about a massive rally via Facebook or Twitter.

32

million cases pending

in India’s judicial system.

1 in 3

Syrians

now needs urgent assistance.

370

political parties

contested India’s last national elections.

70%

of Egypt's labor force

works in the private sector.

70%

of oil consumed in the United States

is for the transportation sector.

20%

of Chechnya’s pre-1994 population

has fled to different parts of the world.

58%

of oil consumed in China

was from foreign sources in 2012.

$536

billion in goods and services

traded between the United States and China in 2012.

$100

billion in foreign investment and oil revenue

have been lost by Iran because of its nuclear program.

4700%

increase in China’s GDP per capita

between 1972 and today.

$11

billion have been spent

to complete the Bushehr nuclear reactor in Iran.

2%

of Iran’s electricity needs

is all the Bushehr nuclear reactor provides.

78

journalists

were imprisoned in Turkey as of August 2012 according to the OSCE.

Stay in the Know

Enter your email address in the field below to receive the latest Carnegie analysis in your inbox!

Personal Information
 
 
Carnegie-Tsinghua Center for Global Policy
 
No. 1 East Zhongguancun Street, Building 3 Tsinghua University Science Park, Chuangye Building, Room 408 Haidian District, Beijing 100084 China