China’s rising power in the international arena, coupled with mounting tensions between North Korea and the United States, provides an impetus for increasing worldwide nuclear and conventional weapons stability. In this podcast, Paul Haenle and James M. Acton examined the status of the U.S. conventional prompt global strike (CPGS) program and assessed its implications for Asia-Pacific and global security.
Acton highlighted the serious risks of escalation inherent within the CPGS system, and noted a genuine concern in China regarding the potential U.S. adoption and use of the program to target Chinese nuclear forces. Acton made the case for the use of confidence-building measures between the United States and China, including data exchanges and system inspections, to reduce the risks of developing hypersonic weapons and to enhance strategic stability.
James Acton
James Acton is a senior associate and co-director of the Nuclear Policy Program. A physicist by training, Acton specializes in deterrence, disarmament, nonproliferation, and nuclear energy His current research focuses on the nuclear fuel cycle in Japan and hypersonic conventional weapons, and is regarded as among the most influential and authoritative experts on this subject.
Paul Haenle
Paul Haenle is the director of the Carnegie–Tsinghua Center for Global Policy. Prior to joining Carnegie, he served from June 2007 to June 2009 as the director for China, Taiwan, and Mongolian Affairs on the National Security Council staffs of former president George W. Bush and President Barack Obama.

Comments(1)
China is already outgunned by the US in conventional and nuclear weapons. The US aint satisfied with this . Its nuclear forces are on 15 min alert to destroy PLA targets.It wants the prompt global strike to enhance its superiority ie to neutralize China's nw. This will be aforlorn mission. The Chinese are investing in hypersonic speed nw. It will spur the Chinese to speed up this. The Chinese aint defenceless like the last ten years and will give a devastating response and this will continue its momentum to give the PLA a secure retaliatory system which pgs wont be unable to guarantee 100 % US security.
Comment Policy
Comments that include profanity, personal attacks, or other inappropriate material will be removed. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, steps will be taken to block users who violate any of the posting standards, terms of use, privacy policies, or any other policies governing this site. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.