There is a consensus in the international community regarding Iran’s nuclear capability: Iran currently cannot build nuclear weapons, but if left unregulated, it would eventually succeed in doing so. Various sources of intelligence have indicated that Iran is still pushing forward with its nuclear program (this includes uranium enrichment). These efforts can no longer be prevaricated by Iran’s claim of civil use.
To this date, the IAEA report issued in November 8, 2011 is the most authoritative document that illustrates Iran’s military motive behind its nuclear program. The report stated that Iran’s military has acquired some equipment and materials that are linked with the production of nuclear weapons and dual-use projects. Secondly, Iran started its nuclear material production in an undeclared fashion. Thirdly, Iran acquired its nuclear information and documents through secret networks. Finally, Iran is designing its nuclear weapons and component experiments independently. All this evidence demonstrates that Iran’s intention is to develop an explosive nuclear device.
The IAEA report comprehensively cited evidence of Iran’s effort in building nuclear weapons. The information is not only based on the investigation conducted by the IAEA and its member states, but also the evidence from Iran. The IAEA stressed the credibility of the information, because it has acquired a large number of Iranian documents, including mail, reports, speech scripts, construction sketches, and video materials.
Taking the credibility of the IAEA into account, we must attach importance to this report. Before the report was published, the Premier of China and the Chinese Foreign Ministry have declared that China will continue adhering to the view that Iran should not obtain nuclear weapons. China is consistent in urging Iran to cooperate with the international community and clarify the purpose of its nuclear program.
However, the IAEA report indicated that Iran was developing its explosive nuclear device prior to 2003. After that, Iran suspended the program, which seems to have restarted in recent years. For instance, Iran no longer complies with nuclear security supervision and the additional protocol of the IAEA in 2008. Iran also suspended its cooperation with the IAEA for further investigation into its nuclear program. Consequently, the IAEA is uncertain about the progress of Iran’s nuclear weapon and highly doubts if Iran is still pushing forward relevant operations. Since Iran hasn’t withdrawn from Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty, it must accept the supervision of the IAEA. For this reason, to achieve a breakthrough in building nuclear weapons in transparent nuclear facilities is almost impossible. Even if Iran wanted to develop nuclear weapons, it must proceed with regulation. The enrichment of the Uranium-235 isotope can only be upgraded to 20% for civil use.
Still, Iran is doing its best to promote research and development in regards to its non-explosive nuclear program as the main purpose for its nuclear program. This is precisely why Iran refused to cooperate with the IAEA and abide by nuclear security supervision and the additional protocol. The attitude of Iran has elicited growing suspicion from the international community. It is undeniable that a country without nuclear weapons would not worry about an investigation and oversight.
Iran is cultivating its capacity for building nuclear weapons and claimed that its developments are currently “not ready.” Iran has not yet acquired weapons-grade nuclear fissile material and Iranian scientists are still exploring nuclear-explosion technology. As practice is the sole criterion for testing the actual capacity of Iran’s nuclear program, a nuclear test is the only way to accurately assess the extent of Iran’s nuclear development. Currently, we cannot draw a conclusion of Iran’s possession of nuclear weapons.
Instead of asking “can they?” the more important question is “should they?” Many other countries are concerned only about the question of “can they?” because if Iran does not have the capacity to build nuclear weapons, there will be no risk. However, the question of “should they?” is based on the negotiating with Iran to cooperate with non-proliferation and international security. Only on that basis can the international community effectively persuade Iran to abandon its efforts of acquiring nuclear weapons. If we fail to consider the question of “should they?,” the world will fall into turmoil. The legitimacy of depriving Iran of its nuclear weapons is established on such rules. As for Iran, it is naturally concerned with the question of “can we?,” yet Iran has failed to go further in terms of building nuclear weapons. Iran’s main concern over the cost of building nuclear weapons is the decisive factor behind Iran’s question of “should we?”
Enter your email address to receive the latest Carnegie analysis in your inbox!